Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-14 00:02 UTC

Message

Re: 800 time

2003-05-14 by paulhaneberg

The 800 uses a Panasonic SU series Bipolar 'Lytic.  The Digikey part 
# is P1198 for 3.3M, P1196 for 1M and P1280 for 10M.
I would have the 1M in circuit at all times.  With the toggle in 
upper position a 3.3M would be in parallel with the 1M for 4.3M.  
With the toggle in lower position a 10M would be in parallel with 
the 1M for 11M.  I might consider trying a 22M just to see what it 
is like.  
I have a Studio Electronics SE-1 which has a quicker attack than the 
MOTM (I think - at least it sounds that way to me).  I really like 
the pop on the attack under some situations.



--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, media.nai@r... wrote:
> At 2:39 PM +0000 5/14/03, paulhaneberg wrote:
> >
> >I was planning on adding a 3 position toggle to my 800s, allowing
> >for three caps to be selected.
> 
> It fits on a 190, so that sounds like it would work.
> 
> >The middle range would use the
> >3.3uf.  I was going to use a 10uf for the long range.  I hadn't
> >selected a cap for the short range yet.  I was thinking about a 
1uf,
> >but I may go a little smaller depending on how fast I want to get.
> 
> I was thinking of building three versions (I have one 800 built, 
two kits
> arrived last week, and two more are on backorder) making three 
stock,
> one extra fast, and one extra slow.  Since I am also adding Moe's 
LED
> mod, my plan is to use three different colors to tell them apart.
> 
> I'm thinking of keeping 3.3uF as the stock value (even though Paul 
S.
> says 6M8 is "ideal"), using 1uF for snappy, and 22uF for extra long
> sweeps and fades.
> 
> Then again I'm just guessing.  Based on reported results, 3M3 is 14
> seconds and 10M is 25 seconds.  So I'm thinking 1M would be be a
> maximum of about 7 seconds, (which is still pretty long) and 22M
> would be about 35 seconds.
> 
> >  I will probably get some stooge panels made for my 800s as I am
> >thinking of adding some other mods as well.  I'm playing with a
> >design for a voltage controlled trigger/gate delay and also with 
the
> >idea of enabling the 800 to retrigger itself so that it would act 
as
> >sort of a LFO.  I have not decided how much of this to incorporate
> >into a modified 800.  I may just make stand alone addons.
> 
> Imho, stand-alone addons would be more flexible and less invasive.
> 
> >BTW, I was planning on replacing C9 with the smallest cap and then
> >adding the other caps in parallel when the toggle is switched.  
That
> >way I could use a three position center off toggle, but I'm unsure
> >whether this will create a leakage problem.
> 
> How would that create a leakage problem??  Have you found source 
and
> part number for low-leakage non-polar radial caps??  So far it is
> between the Panasonic SU and the Xicon NPRL.   Any idea which part
> the 800 uses for 3.3uf??  I can't tell from the markings.
> 
> 
> At 9:25 PM -0400 5/13/03, media.nai@r... wrote:
> >Digikey lists three different Xicon radial 6.8uF 50V non-polar and
> >bi-polar caps in their catalog on page 265.
> 
> Doh!!  That should be Mouser instead of Digikey.  It's on page 265 
of
> Mouser catlaog 612.   Digikey lists the Panasonic SU.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.