The 800 uses a Panasonic SU series Bipolar 'Lytic. The Digikey part # is P1198 for 3.3M, P1196 for 1M and P1280 for 10M. I would have the 1M in circuit at all times. With the toggle in upper position a 3.3M would be in parallel with the 1M for 4.3M. With the toggle in lower position a 10M would be in parallel with the 1M for 11M. I might consider trying a 22M just to see what it is like. I have a Studio Electronics SE-1 which has a quicker attack than the MOTM (I think - at least it sounds that way to me). I really like the pop on the attack under some situations. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, media.nai@r... wrote: > At 2:39 PM +0000 5/14/03, paulhaneberg wrote: > > > >I was planning on adding a 3 position toggle to my 800s, allowing > >for three caps to be selected. > > It fits on a 190, so that sounds like it would work. > > >The middle range would use the > >3.3uf. I was going to use a 10uf for the long range. I hadn't > >selected a cap for the short range yet. I was thinking about a 1uf, > >but I may go a little smaller depending on how fast I want to get. > > I was thinking of building three versions (I have one 800 built, two kits > arrived last week, and two more are on backorder) making three stock, > one extra fast, and one extra slow. Since I am also adding Moe's LED > mod, my plan is to use three different colors to tell them apart. > > I'm thinking of keeping 3.3uF as the stock value (even though Paul S. > says 6M8 is "ideal"), using 1uF for snappy, and 22uF for extra long > sweeps and fades. > > Then again I'm just guessing. Based on reported results, 3M3 is 14 > seconds and 10M is 25 seconds. So I'm thinking 1M would be be a > maximum of about 7 seconds, (which is still pretty long) and 22M > would be about 35 seconds. > > > I will probably get some stooge panels made for my 800s as I am > >thinking of adding some other mods as well. I'm playing with a > >design for a voltage controlled trigger/gate delay and also with the > >idea of enabling the 800 to retrigger itself so that it would act as > >sort of a LFO. I have not decided how much of this to incorporate > >into a modified 800. I may just make stand alone addons. > > Imho, stand-alone addons would be more flexible and less invasive. > > >BTW, I was planning on replacing C9 with the smallest cap and then > >adding the other caps in parallel when the toggle is switched. That > >way I could use a three position center off toggle, but I'm unsure > >whether this will create a leakage problem. > > How would that create a leakage problem?? Have you found source and > part number for low-leakage non-polar radial caps?? So far it is > between the Panasonic SU and the Xicon NPRL. Any idea which part > the 800 uses for 3.3uf?? I can't tell from the markings. > > > At 9:25 PM -0400 5/13/03, media.nai@r... wrote: > >Digikey lists three different Xicon radial 6.8uF 50V non-polar and > >bi-polar caps in their catalog on page 265. > > Doh!! That should be Mouser instead of Digikey. It's on page 265 of > Mouser catlaog 612. Digikey lists the Panasonic SU.
Message
Re: 800 time
2003-05-14 by paulhaneberg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.