Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] 800 time

2003-05-13 by Paul Schreiber

Well, the faster/slower times apply to BOTH extremes.

Increasing C9 allows longer Releases, but the minimum Attack is proportionally  *longer*.

I found that 6.8uf seemed to be the ideal value, but couldn't find any low-leakage non-polars in
the correct voltage (needs to be 25V or better).

I have several folks that have "stock" 3.3uf caps in 2 EGs and 10uf in 2 other ones for like 25
sec. Releases. But the price you pay is a very narrow panel control range for "snappy" Attacks.

The other solution: use a MOTM-820 as an AR envelope. You can get 'snappy' Attack (defined as
<1ms) and Release times approaching 1 *minute*.

Paul S.



----- Original Message -----
From: <media.nai@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 3:19 PM
Subject: [motm] 800 time


>
> Is there any way to lengthen the maximum time or shorten the minimum
> time of the MOTM-800??  I'm thinking decreasing the value of C9 (a
> 3M3 bipolar) would make the envelopes faster, and increasing C9 would
> make them slower.  Has anyone tried this??
>
> If I remember correctly, Paul S. said something about this a while
> back, but I looked and couldn't find it.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.