MOTM

I like the idea of the full size plate. That gives even more
flexibility on where the L shaped brackets could be positioned.

John Loffink
jloffink@...

The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com/

The Wavemakers Modular and Integrated Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/

> First: Two separate L shaped brackets, as John suggested, both the

PCB

> short bracket depth. They would never actually be connected to each
> other.
> They would be attached separately to the front panel and each support

1/2

> of
> the PCB. Then the PCB would not have metal the entire length.
>
> Another way to do it would be to have these two standard brackets that
> were
> the holders for PCB sized flat plates for mounting the PCBs. The "L"
> brackets would attach to the flat part of the bracket with screws.

Howard

> U
> did one like this that mounted from jack holes. At first I thought

maybe

> there was not advantage of the full size plate. But, then I thought

maybe

> there would be times that the PCB would not be the right size to

straddle

> the gap between the L shaped brackets.
>
> I propose that we might need 3 new pieces:
> 1. L bracket with same pot hole arrangement I use today.
> 2. L bracket with 2 jack holes on standard MOTM spacing (one above

the

> other)
> 3. One full size flat PCB mounting plate that could be fastened to

any

> combination of L brackets IF it was needed.
>