This sounds great! I like the idea of changing the gain level when switching from dual to mono mode. I'm sure that I would be using dual 3 to 1 mixers the majority of the time. It might be a good idea to label the two sides of the mixer LINEAR and LOG as a visual reminder of which pots are which. John B. In a message dated 10/9/99 9:57:34 PM, synth1@... writes: >After reading over the previous inputs, and researching the potentional >op amps that are both low drift and decent audio quality, here is what >I've >decided to build: >The mixer has 6 inputs, 2 outputs. Each input has an attenuator. >One output (called the SUB) uses a special switching jack (it is a >Switchcraft 113). This jack >has an isolated contact that is actuated when the plug is inserted. Unlike >the current 112A jacks, >it is not connected to the signal path. It's just a switch. >This switch controls 7(!) analog switches. The mixer is set up "normally" >with 6 inputs and 1 output. >3 inputs have log pots, and 3 inputs have linear pots. If you are mixing >2 >or 3 audio signals, you >use the log input channels. Certainly, you can use 1 or more linear >channels, too (but the controls are >more sensitive to small rotational increments). The linear channels are >for >DC control voltages, but again >you can use the log ones, too. I am guessing 90% of the time 2 or 3 signals >is all you are mixing. >There are 2 GAIN pots. In the default 6:1 configuration, only 1 GAIN knob >is >active: it controls the master >gain. The other knob is shorted out by an analog switch. >NOW.......if you plug a patchcord into the SUB OUT jack, lots of stuff >happens. The mixer is split into 2 seperate >3:1 sections. The aforementioned dead GAIN pot now is active for the linear >section (it's a linear pot, too). >The former master GAIN pot controls the log section (it's a log pot). >When you go to dual 3:1, the feedback resistor in the summer is switched. >So, there will be a gain change of >nearly 2:1 when you do this. You will have to watch out! This is so the >smaller 3:1 sections can get maximum >dynamic range, as well as when we are in 6:1 mode. >The opamps used are (currently, until I find a better one) Analog Devices >AD822s. These have low drift (about >9 times LOWER than a TL072) and about 4 times LOWER offset >voltage.Generally, the *drift* is what is important, >and also we need decent audio performance. I'm also going to look at the >OP-285. Also, the same low-drift >precision resistors used in the MOTM-300 VCO front end are used. >I think this design is a good tradeoff with the proposed solutions. It >offer >6:1 or dual 3:1, does not require expensive dual pots, >and handles audio and CVs. I will bootstrap the output sections to drive >1500pf loads (about 20 feet of cable). >I'll start breadboarding in about 10 days (about how low AD takes for a >sample request) and hopefully can offer >it at the same time the MOTM-440 filter ships. Since there are 8 jacks >and 8 >pots, the kit will be around $139.
Message
Re: Mixers....again.
1999-10-10 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.