In a message dated 11/5/02 10:59:47 PM Central Standard Time, ringmod45@... writes: > The problem is caused by the wobble, thereby creating an error. Since > you have lost the bit in question, you can not recover it It's been 20 years since I've read about CD encoding technology, so can someone correct me if I'm wrong here? I seem to remember reading that the data on a CD is duplicated once or possibly twice on every disc. That way, is there is a loss of any data, the error correction tells the laser to go to one of the extra tracks to recover it. The chances of the same bits of data on both tracks being bad is very slim, so this takes care of most of the errors. Also, I seem to remember that the laser pickup is on a transport that moves up and down. There is a sensor and circuitry that determines how far away the disc is from the laser at any given point in time. It then physically moves the laser up and down to follow any movement of disc surface. This keeps the laser in focus on the disc surface to avoid loss of data. When data cannot be recovered, error correction then kicks in to the phase that Paul mentioned somewhere, and interpolates any lost data. For what it's worth, I used to work at a high end audio shop years ago. One of the guys from McIntosh (I think it was) came in to talk to us about the product line. To demonstate the integrity of the error correction on their CD players, he attached thin strips of masking tape (drafter's tape?) to the discs. He put them on one by one, radially across the surface of the CD. He got up to something like 6 or 8 strips until it caused noticeable problems with the music! This is pretty wild considering that each one of those strips of tape was about 1/8" thick. Comparing that to the size of each bit on the disc surface (forgot how many microns that is), you get an idea of how well the error correction works. This was 15+ years ago, so I'd assume there have even been more improvements since then. Andrew
Message
Re: [motm] Re: digital source and its medium puzzle- the answer
2002-11-06 by ixqy@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.