Mike Marsh writes: >>I posted the mp3 to the Files section. There is some warble from the noise reduction algorithm, but you get the essential character. Woody, but nasal.<< There is some boxy and woody quality. The piezo is so buzzy though and kind of high pitched. I wonder if low pass filtering the synth signal would help cut down on the buzz. If you get better results in any future experiment, it would be interesting to also hear what the piezo sounds like by itself so it's easier to see the affect of the guitar body. Groovyshaman writes: >>The experiments I have done (along with a cellist friend of mine) are primarally only half of what you are aiming to accomplish, namely, signal pickup (via piezo)<< Actually that's not half but opposite. >>although I am hoping to at some point add transducer stimulation of the bridge. Our plan was to mount the cello to a "holder" (which we would have to design & build), attach a metal plate to the cello's bridge, and mount an electromagnet to the holder within proximity to the bridge.<< If you ever get that done I'd be very interested in how it sounds. I searched around for a cello on the internet a while back and saw that they can be bought new for as low as $250 to $350. However I've been hesitant to spend the money unless I know it will produce useful results. >>One thing we did verify is how markedly different the signal response is based on the mounting location of the piezo pickup - no shock there.<< Much like the different pickup positions on an electric guitar. That's why it might be better just to mic the cello from a small distance away as you would with most acoustic instruments. -Elhardt
Message
[motm] MOTM thru the transducer
2002-11-06 by elhardt@att.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.