I won't copy and paste everybodies posts to keep from making a mess. I'll just respond. Larry Hendrey missed the part where I said I wanted to remove a string and in its place put some kind of device to vibrate the bridge. That would vibrate at whatever pitch my synthesized waveform is. So matt_stubb and groovshaman are correct in understanding what I wanted to do. I would need to keep the other 3 strings there to firmly hold the bridge down, plus in all the reading I've been doing about the violin, the body tone is a little different when under the tension of all the strings than without any strings. Without strings the main formants are lower in pitch. When I thought of doing this a couple of years back I thought maybe I could just screw a speaker into the back of a violin body. It's hard to tell if that would give me any useful results or not. Based on what I've read, the bridge acts like a lever and where it rests on the violin body and it's internal structural supports determines where or how strong some of the main resonances will be. I'm looking at a small speaker now and there's the possibility if I cut off the speaker cone I could use the transducer portion of the speaker to vibrate something. I don't know how I'd mount it to the bridge, but maybe I could compromise and remove the bridge and strings and mount it where the bridge was. -Elhardt
Message
Re: [motm] transducers, input or output?
2002-11-04 by elhardt@att.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.