Hi Elhardt, Very interesting. I'm thinking there are basically two possibilities here: 1) Use a voltage-to-movement transducer to induce vibration in the strings, causing the instrument to "play" itself. Of course, without fretting, the instrument would be somewhat limited to the fundamental frequencies and associated harmonics of the four strings (along with body resonances.) You could string the violin with steel strings and use electro-magnets to induce movement. Another option could be to use one or more piezo-transducers mounted to the bridge. If you are thinking of amplifying the resultant signal, you could mount a microphone or piezo-pickup on the bridge and pass the signal thru a pre-amp back to the synth. Pickup location will be very sensitive, I'm sure. 2) Use the violin body as a resonating filter of sorts; to pass an audio signal "through" the body of the violin and recover the resultant signal. A voltage-to-movement transducer could be used at audio frequencies to "excite" the body resonances, and a movement-to-voltage transducer could then pick up the resultant signal. Probably the optimal inducer would be a very small full-range speaker mounted inside (!) the body. The best pickup would probably be a mic. Another idea, you could mount a metal plate to the bridge and use an electro-magnet to set the bridge into motion (but how would you mount this? hmm). Obviously, mounting locations would have the greatest effect on the response of this filter; there are so many different resonance components. There are quite a few challenging issues here: obtaining the appropriate signal levels for both inducing and recovery, transducer types, mounting hardware and location, etc. Sounds like fun! I would be very curious to hear how this experiment turns out. FYI, I have dabbled somewhat with piezo-transducer pickups on a cello, passing the resultant signal thru my MOTM rig. Cheers, George ----- Original Message ----- From: <elhardt@...> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 1:58 AM Subject: [motm] transducers, input or output? > I've always thought that transducers were another name for pickups, and doing > an internet search that seems to be what they are. They convert an acoustic > vibration into an electrical signal. But when reading about the old Ondes > Martenot keyboard instrument, they say that one of the speakers (or diffusers) > uses a transducer to drive the strings on one of these diffusers. Is there a > device that I can use that takes an electronic signal and converts it into an > acoustic vibration for setting a string in motion or driving the bridge of an > acoustic instrument? Something other than a speaker that is. I'm still thinking > about setting a violin in motion using a synthesizer. > > -Elhardt
Message
Re: [motm] transducers, input or output?
2002-11-04 by groovyshaman@snet.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.