MOTM

> > rounding the edges off anyway, but it's still not accurate - as compared
> > to the source.
> At the risk of spiraling way off-topic, I feel compelled to address this
> very common misunderstanding. The Nyquist Theorem provides the
> mathematical underpinning for *exact* transformation of a continuous
> representation of audio into a discrete representation. If you sample a
> 10kHz sine wave at 20.01kHz, you get a 10kHz sine wave coming back out.
> There are no "edges" to round off, because the digital-to-analog
> reconstruction is not done by connecting the dots.

But if you sampled a 10khz sine and a 10khz square wave, it'll still come
out exactly the same. Having a higher sampling rate will yield
better/closer to the original results, which was the point of the original
post IIRC.

-->Neil

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Bradley            In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is not
Synthcom Systems, Inc.  king - he's a prisoner.
ICQ #29402898