At 1:55 AM +0000 09/19/02, coyoteous wrote: > >Well, a mixer without (summing) busses wouldn't be a mixer, >would it? :-) I count 13 (Mono, L, R, G1-G4 and 6 auxes). If you >mean subs, submasters or subGROUPS, there are 4. The Crest >is intended for live use, but don't discount the sonics - they are >top notch - way beyond the price point and it's built like a tank. Yes, that's what I meant by busses. I didn't notice g1-g4 when I looked at their webpage. Now I see they are above the main faders. I'm going to download the pdf manual check to see if it has a "control room" or "FOH monitor" output in stereo. I need to be able to monitor in stereo. >> Right now, I am leaning towards the Allen & Heath four bus >>(WZ14:4:2+). Unfortunately, it won't monitor PFL (solo) in stereo. The PFL and AFL busses are mono. So it's not an option. A&H are suggesting the Wizard 20S, but "at this price point we do not have stereo input channel PFL". Price point isn't so much the issue as physical size. >These are nice from my recollection, I almost bought one. I >ended up with a CAD (perhaps the biggest of all rack mixers) >that I eventually returned because of all of it's problems (mosty >mechanical, it sounded incredible - straight wire with gain and a >pinch of warmth - minimal caps in the signal path - lots of servo). CAD?? >> The Midas 160 is another option... > >Haven't heard it yet, people like the EQ a lot. Yes, people do like their EQ. However, according to their site, the sweepable mid-low EQ only goes as low as 100Hz, and the fixed low is at 80Hz. Sufficient for correcting off-axis mics, but a bit lacking for producing electronic music. >It's probably a little >warmer than the Crest based on their bigger consoles. FWIW, I won't make much use of the discrete mic pres. I was wrong when I said it was too thick -- I had confused it with the TL Audio. Now that I've taken a closer look it might be more flexible than I thought as well. It is designed extremely well for live use, and seems quite capable of running a PA much larger than one would typically connect to a board its size. However, I'm planning on using it for my own studio use, so at this point I am going to keep looking.
Message
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM Mega-Mixer?? [OT]
2002-09-19 by media.nai@rcn.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.