I'm really encouraged by Moe's e-mail on future improvements to user interface. The compromises imposed on the user interface by the conformity to a "grid" of knobs are, IMHO, a source of many of the complaints. And allowing different knob sizes will be a big gain. For example, the micro VCA's labeling could have been more complete with the extra real estate gained by using some smaller knobs for less frequently used functions. Extra functions in modules are of course welcome, but there is a point at which the usability of an interface is hampered by the compromises imposed by having EVERY function presented at the same level of importance to the user. For example, if there are 5 interesting but arcane functions that are rarely used on a module that crowd the one often used function, making it hard to find within the grid of identical knobs, the module is compromised. Why not have a normal knob with some space around it for the often used function, and smaller knobs (to the side or below) for those arcane functions we all secretly love? I hope this will be possible in future MOTM modules. I'd gladly give up F-111 washers for this! As an aside, the latest BMW 7-series sedan incorporates a new CPU- based dash, with menus and pseudo joystick to access dozens of functions. Many people hate it. Like the DX7, too many buried functions. A modular CAN fall into the same trap, even though all functions are accessable simultaneously, if the functions are buried as needles in haystacks of identical knobs, spaced identically in grids with limited labeling. Dare I say it... it reminds me of searching through menus... Best regards, Roger
Message
Re: User Interface design - Moe's long semiannual rant
2002-08-12 by rogerpellegrini
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.