TA> And there is a school of thought that says the harder it is to learn the more creative you will become. Actually, I didn't say that I agree with this school of thought. And I don't, not without more quantification. I was just trying to make a point that if you have more tools, it will allow you to create more. But more tools mean a longer or steeper learning curve. A simple machine such as the minimoog may not allow textures to be created that the composer may want. Its still a great instrument though [but I wish they had added a few extras like sync, sync sweep, an LFO, aftertouch... :-) ] Of course, making a unit with a badly designed user interface will stiffle creativity. That is not without question, and that wasn't my point. I merely was trying to say that new esoteric modules that do clever things are just another thing to learn not some impenetrable wall acting against creativity. But make that esoteric module difficult to use by a poorly designed UI, and that's another story. BTW, that particular 'school of thought' I heard used when a music teacher was comparing violin playing to recorder playing. The violin is a complete bugger to master, while the recorder is comparatively easy. But a well played violin allows more expression and more soul than any recorder. Actually, I have heard some storming picolo playing, so that probably puts paid to that idea anyway... :-) Tony <- who doesn't make anything terribly esoteric at all
Message
Re: [motm] Re: worth replacing a Mini-Moog??, Creativity
2002-08-10 by Tony Allgood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.