Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Message

Re: Hypothetical Q

1999-09-17 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

In no way do I believe that Paul was (or would!) "sit on" 3340s (not to 
mention the several other CEMs that he "claims" to have found on a visit to 
Doug Curtis "storage shed").

Why? For one reason, because I first heard about Synthesis Technologies 
THROUGH OnChip Systems (Doug Curtis) when I made an inquiry (via mail) to 
them about the availability of CEM ICs. When I first got on synth-diy about 2 
& 1/2 years ago, Paul was beginning to talk about the idea of building 
modular kits (weren't you thinking of a super high end kit called Titan?) and 
wanted to make a new run of 3340s for use in such a modular -- I remember 
there being a lot of list interest in the 3340s that didn't pan out to the 
several thousand dollars required to retool. 

As I recall Paul offered 3340s for the whole year of 1997 (I bought some for 
$16, and a bunch of hard sync rejects for $4.00 each!!!!!). I spent well over 
a hundred dollars buying stuff from Paul before the first MOTM module was 
shipped, I've also bought several "bonus boxes" of Paul's junk (whenever he 
cleans out his work room -- hence the recent references) as well as all my 
MOTM stuff and have never felt that Paul has tried to rip me off -- ever! 

I also believe that if Paul had known of these 3340s he would have used them 
in the MOTM VCO, or at least proposed the idea. A few months ago I bought 
several MOTM 300 PCB rejects (for $4.00 each), but the cost of: the MAT 02, 
two OP 275s, LT 1013 and the tempco is well over what I imagine a 3340 
costing -- if you cost it out, you'll see that this is no way to save money.

But I do like your choice of screen name. I bought several 3310s from Paul 
(since I really like them!) before he ran out of them. It was easy since he 
posted several times to the list (either MOTM or DIY) that he was running low 
and almost out -- I guess I was lucky to be on the list, and lucky to pay 
attention.

I may be a stooge, but I ain't stupid,
JB

In a message dated 9/16/99 8:48:57 PM, CEM3310@... writes:

>d) put them on your head, look in the mirror and ask yourself if you think
>
>we're all so stupid believing you haven't been sitting on them all the
>while.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.