MOTM

Yes, this *is* smart if you want the fix and it involves part 
changes.  I guess I would have two unfixed and two 'fixed'...

--- In motm@y..., Adam Schabtach <adam@s...> wrote:
> > Indeed if anyone is reconsidering an 800 order, that would be
> > unwise.  This EG kicks ass.
> 
> I recently received the four -800 kits that I purchased as part of 
my first
> MOTM order. I've built one but haven't had a chance to even power 
it up. Do
> I have any second thoughts about these modules based on what I've 
read here?
> Absolutely not. OTOH I might wait to start building the other 
three until
> after Paul has tinkered for awhile. :-)
> 
> Paul, I'd vote that you don't fix the
> decay-acts-like-attack-when-sustain-is-10 bug. That sounds more 
like a
> feature to me. The decay parameter really has no meaning when the 
sustain is
> 10, so if it does something unusual in this circumstance, that 
sounds like
> behavior that might be useful. Essentially it's another attack 
contour, and
> we can always use different contours from one modulation source.
> 
> --Adam