Black_Man_Music@... wrote: > micro VCA... correct? I don't think you're surprising > anyone here. Atleast I assumed you were going to > release a micro VCA w/ the rest of the line. Business > standpoint this is needed far greater than a panning > VCA. Complete your micro line... duh! While I can see that the micro-module line is very important for the portable SKB-pop-up dudes, being one of the much-larger-format MOTMists, I'm MUCH more interested in the 2U MOTM-130 than the uVCA. Alas, I remember Paul saying that the PCB layout of the 130 was a real headache. Guess he wan't kidding! [insert duh here] > In this list of EE's and EE wannabe's, no one has > figured out that you can buy a $500 EFX processor, > Digital Performer/Pro Tools, or (gasp) a board that > does auto-panning/fading?? Yikes. Well, [ahem] being an EE sorta-wannabe myself (and a synthesist definite-wannabe) my interest will not be swayed torward the concept of auto-panning (or any other synthesis technique, for that matter) with some analog-wannabe software tool. Give me voltage control! Live free or die! et al... :) Cheers, George
Message
Re: [motm] MOTM queue
2002-04-30 by George Kisslak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.