Well, as usual, I can't get into the ^%#$^#& Yahoo site... it tells me left, right, & center that I don't exist, even though I get an Email from them on average about every 4 minutes. So I guess I won't officially register my vote, but it would have been for #1, the original. I could almost get behind the "little knob" version, but the knobs look a little lonely on that 3u. Personally, I would do little knobs on a 2U and drop the "Bypass" switch and LED completely. I find bypass switches on individual modules in a modular to be of extremely little use, but I do realize that some people buy a stray MOTM module as an 'effects box' kind of thing. The 3row1 wouldn't be bad if the bands were more sequential. I think that's what turns me off to some of the variations; a fixed filter bank is, by its nature, a module whose parameters are so sequentially "stacked" that I really feel like the knob layout should reflect that, although the Moog look with the shelving filters to either side isn't a bad idea either. I just really resist the 4u idea above all else -- That's a LOT of cabinet space to go to this module. That's my two pence. o http://www.hotrodmotm.com/images/motm/m-450_3U_2x5_around.jpg
Message
FW: [motm] New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by Tkacs, Ken
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.