MOTM

> That sounds like overkill to me.  Based on research papers 
that I've read,
> and my own ears, 24/96 conversion doesn't sound any better 
than 24/44.1

I tend to agree, but that wasn't my point. The idea was to get 
20khz bandwidth and the bottom end of the control range - 192 at 
the top, 96 in the middle, 48 at the bottom.

> This is true.  There are many 16-bit converters that sound 
better than
> 24-bit converters.  While there is a noticeable difference 
between 16-bit
> and 20-bit, the difference between 20-bit and 24-bit seems 
insignificant.

Converters tend to come in increments of 8 bits these days. 

> I have five digital delays, and four of them have voltage control.  
It's a
> very common feature.

Can you name one that is still in production?

> However, none of them can pass DC, which is what I would 
want in an motm
> digital delay module.

Now you're talkin', I suppose if it were for cv range only it could be 
pretty cheap to make. Otherwise, that's where the "ghost 
electronics" come in.

Barry