OK, I'll offer up an opinion and disclaimer. I did not exactly follow John's recommendations. But, I did use up all the ground pads available on the PCB. You will notice I combined some grounds and not others. I did not mix CVs and audio or anything else that logically made sense to me might interfere with one another (which seemed to be John's basic approach too from my casual observation). Here was my small brain's thought process. In an unbalanced scheme, there is as much signal current in the shield as the signal conductor. So, if you have only one wire from jacks to PCB, then all these currents mix on the way to the PCB. And, no matter how hard you try to keep them separate, you cannot completely because they jacks are all quite well bonded at the panel. So, some interaction between CVs and audio caused by the voltage drop in the ground connection will occur. Ideally, there would be no common path (isolated grounds, isolated path on the PCB). But, that of course is not the case. My thought was that I wanted as little interaction between I/Os as possible. So, that meant to keep the R of the ground connection from jacks to the PCB very low. Therefore, I went with the multiple wire method. I assume the single wire method might work just as well, provided the wire was not significantly undersized. Since there is a limit to the wire size that can connect to the TM PCB, the multiple wire path made sense to me. Disclaimer: I don't posses the educational accreditation to support my theory. This is not meant to be an instruction on how it should be done, but rather an insight on what I was thinking when I largely just followed the designer's recommendation and made my own decisions. I have never built any of my modules with the "strap 'em all together, one ground wire" method. In fact looking at my Multimix, I see I used shielded I/0 and used heat shrink near the PCB where I tapped the PCB end of the shield to run a ground wire over to the SCRN connection (unless using the adjacent ground connection). I am also not offering any criticism to the other methods. Larry (now you know how my crazy brain works somewhat) Hendry P.S. Since the TM is basically a "lo-fi" device AND according to our quiet list friend Harry B, "BDDs suck" does it really matter? ----- Original Message ----- From: thomas white <djthomaswhite@...> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:33 AM Subject: [motm] Conversions Question I am in the process of converting my Blacet Time Machine to MOTM format and pose this question. Since all of the grounds on the Blacet schematic individually "star" back to one point on the pcb, can't I simply connect all the jacks with unshielded wire in a star type web and run one connection off this web to the pcb ground for the same overall effect? I used the unshielded wire method and it appears to work fine. Although in looking on Larry Hendry's page I noticed that his model uses Blacets wiring scheme while Dave Hylander uses the "Oakley Type" unshielded wire approach as I did. Comments? Thomas White PS. Nice to not have to fiddle with 1/8 cables anymore :) _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [motm] Conversions Question
2002-02-26 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.