MOTM

Ditto!! K.I.S.S. why make it too complex. I got a modular system because I 
didn't like the programming of digital systems.


>From: John Speth <johns@...>
>Reply-To: motm@onelist.com
>To: "'motm@onelist.com'" <motm@onelist.com>
>Subject: RE: [motm] DoMOAS live performance features
>Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:18:19 -0700
>
>From: John Speth <johns@...>
>
>On Thursday, September 09, 1999 2:56 PM, Mark Pulver
>[SMTP:mpulver@...] wrote:
> > Variable stage timing. This is the ability to have a stage set it's own
> > length. This allows for a sequence to be arhythmic. The MAQ 16/3 is like
> > this, as well as the arpeggiator and sequencer in the Q. It's a lot more
> > fun than you may think. :)
>
>Isn't "Variable stage timing" just the classic application of a 2 row x N
>step sequencer?  Row 2 CV output drives the VCO that clocks the sequencer
>and Row 1 provides the CV for use downstream.  Now *this* is the perfect
>reason for a M310 uVCO - to provide voltage controlled clocking of
>sequencers.
>
>I don't think the sequencer should be bogged down with every feature under
>the sun lest we get MOAS again.  I *do* think it should be carefully
>crafted to interface well with other modules and that perfection can be
>found in simplicity.
>
>John Speth
>Object Engineering, Inc
>mailto:johns@...
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>How would you like to have a voice in the marketplace and be
>rewarded for it? SurveySpot members earn cash and prizes for
>taking part in market research studies!
>  <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/surveyspot1 ">Click Here</a>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------