MOTM

In a message dated 2/17/02 12:46:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, endiendi@... 
writes:


> the super moe 
> project would be welcome by lots of folks and the big and several 
> pcbs would all be easily probably purchased. It would take much more 
> time before people would finish building the super moe but lots of 
> them would start  buying the PCBs


I agree with this. I really like the idea behind the Super Moe (modularize 
all the internal functions of a sequencer to make the most powerful version 
of a sequencer) but I agree if this idea were ever to be taken on by either 
Paul or Moe, it would be a while before they sold enough of these "sub" 
modules to see a profit. It would also be a daunting outlay of cash before 
any user would have anything like a sequencer.

In that regard, I favor Moe's idea of having a more basic sequencer available 
-- besides, a lot of interesting things can happen with multiple sequencers 
running at one time.

Assuming a larger MOTM analog sequencer will eventually become available, 
what about reducing the size even smaller to a 3U 8 X 1 (maybe a 4 X 2) with 
all the basic features (clock in, hold, up/down, reset, etc.) and an 
additional chain out to link several of these together to make longer (or 
polyphonic) sequences.

What is the projected cost of the finished project to the user? And what kind 
of op amps will you be specifying -- low drift expensive ones perhaps?

JB