MOTM

----- Original Message -----

From: John Loffink

To: jhaible@... ; jwbarlow@... ; motm@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:17 PM

Subject: RE: [motm] possible micro module?

Yes, I\u2019d like one of these too, but with better droop characteristics on the S&H and non-attenuated inputs for precision capture of VCO control voltages.

John Loffink
jloffink@...

-----Original Message-----
From: jhaible@... [mailto:jhaible@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:40 AM
To: jwbarlow@...; motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] possible micro module?

If you have several S&H's in one module it would only be consequent to
chain them like the Serge Analog Shift Register. (I have a circuit for something
like that.) Individual Signal inputs and clock inputs for each stage (to use
them as separate S&H's), but normalized to a Analogue-Shift-Register chain.

JH.



jwbarlow@... schrieb:
> Sorry to interrupt the current discussion of the pros and cons of schematics.
>
> I was thinking today how nice it would be to have several more sample and
> hold modules in any given system (I think it's an under appreciated and under
> utilized module). Though the 101s aren't expensive at all, they only supply
> one S/H per module and some elaborate random/noise functions, of which one
> probably wouldn't need more than a few in any system.
>
> What I was thinking was a 1U module with six jacks (S/H in, S/H out, external
> pulse in) and 3 knobs (2 S/H attenuators, and internal clock rate) -- two
> independent basic S/H units sharing a common clock which would be defeated by
> inserting a jack into the external pulse input of each S/H.
>
> With this module and an 820 one could get the VC sample and hold that I had
> proposed a long time ago.
>
> JB

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.