Yes, I'd like one of these too, but with better droop characteristics on the S&H and non-attenuated inputs for precision capture of VCO control voltages. John Loffink jloffink@... -----Original Message----- From: jhaible@... [mailto:jhaible@...] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:40 AM To: jwbarlow@...; motm@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [motm] possible micro module? If you have several S&H's in one module it would only be consequent to chain them like the Serge Analog Shift Register. (I have a circuit for something like that.) Individual Signal inputs and clock inputs for each stage (to use them as separate S&H's), but normalized to a Analogue-Shift-Register chain. JH. jwbarlow@... schrieb: > Sorry to interrupt the current discussion of the pros and cons of schematics. > > I was thinking today how nice it would be to have several more sample and > hold modules in any given system (I think it's an under appreciated and under > utilized module). Though the 101s aren't expensive at all, they only supply > one S/H per module and some elaborate random/noise functions, of which one > probably wouldn't need more than a few in any system. > > What I was thinking was a 1U module with six jacks (S/H in, S/H out, external > pulse in) and 3 knobs (2 S/H attenuators, and internal clock rate) -- two > independent basic S/H units sharing a common clock which would be defeated by > inserting a jack into the external pulse input of each S/H. > > With this module and an 820 one could get the VC sample and hold that I had > proposed a long time ago. > > JB Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=210675.1853748.3359285.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705 032277:HM/A=806910/R=0/*https:/www.consumerinfo.com/cb/yahooccms/form_on line_a1.asp?sc=14856015> Click Here! <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=210675.1853748.3359285.1261774/D=egrou pmail/S=1705032277:HM/A=806910/rand=221737982> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
Message
RE: [motm] possible micro module?
2002-02-01 by John Loffink
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.