MOTM

Because THEN it's not an analog process. I could have gone full DSP and had
a CODEC and a DSP and that's about it, (which is something Chris and I were
discussing) but we wanted to retain that "analog" thang.

Tony



> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhaible [mailto:jhaible@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:31 PM
> To: John Loffink; 'J. Larry Hendry'; 'MOTM List'; Tony Karavidas
> Subject: Re: [motm] more NAMM poop
>
>
> > range of shift. (Especially at the slower end) The multipliers
> would still
> > be fully analog and so would the entire audio path.
>
> Why ?
> If you make the oscillators digital (which is a good idea), you might as
> well
> replace the multipliers with multiplying DACs.
>
> JH.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>