MOTM

> The FS shown at NAMM is neither of those things, but one change that is
> being considered is having the local oscillator change from analog to
> digital, and this would cost effectively provide both features, and
> a wider range of shift. (Especially at the slower end) The multipliers
> would still be fully analog and so would the entire audio path. The
> price wouldn't change, but the ship date would slip. I think it
> would be a better product overall, but maybe other's would disagree.


I would much rather have the increased functionality and enhanced frequency
range that using the digital oscillator would bring.

I've oft wondered why we don't have more digital components in modules...and
I begin to think of the possibilities.  Not that I'm going for a digital
audio oscillator or filter anytime soon, but considering some of the other
CV or audio signal processing capabilities..ooOOOOOooo...somebody do it now!

Willing to wait longer for a better piece of gear....

I'm going to order this almost as soon as it's available....projected ship
date?



Les Mizzell

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Did you ever walk into a room
and forget why you walked in?
I think that's how dogs spend
their lives." -- Sue Murphy
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -