> >Korg Electribe-S drum machine as master clock (Midi), > > Really?? I would have never guessed you used gear like that!! I hope it will be heard when I have finished my next CD. (;->) But I admit that I don't really make much use of the thousand functions of the ES-1. I'm not too good at drum programming, and sampling new sounds isn't what I will spend many hours either. However, I'm using the ES-1 together with one of my home-built phasers. This has two independent stereo channels, and the resonance is rather "controlled" up to almost self oscillation, and I'm modulating the two stereo channels with a Sample & Hold (2nd channel with inverted modulation). When I run the ES-1 thru *this*, it doesn't sound like samples anymore (nor like the cheap built-in effects). The drum samples trigger the almost-self oscillation of the phaser; that's 3 BPF peaks on each side, and with the "pole spread" feature the 3 BPFs aren't linked in a constant pattern like on an ordinary phaser. If you look at these old analogue drum machines, they often contain almost-self oscillating filters for some of the instruments, and here it is very similar. The difference is that the pitch of these "phaser drums" is changed with the S&H every couple of beats, and they are triggered by samples (from the ES-1) rather than with simple gate signals. It's a very unique drum machine, with new instruments kicked in all the time without actually programming them. (;->) It's hard to describe in words, but I think the next CD will have a couple oft tracks that are based on this. > >Frostwave Fat Contoller sequencer to convert Midi clock to analogue Gate > >(which then is used as an analog master clock for the whole studio). > >Digital delay (TC Electronic D-Two - awsome delay !) also sync'ed > >to Midi Clock. > > I like those too, but I've made a decision not to invest in any more > digital gear, or at least not new digital gear. It's like setting money on > fire. Well, i think along similar paths, really, but the FAT controller was less expensive than the Korg SQ-10 which I had before, and I like it so much better. > I like the idea of a PLL synced BBD delay, but I don't know what math would > be required so that ratio between the input clock and clock driving the BBD > would result in a musical relationship such as a quarter note. The length of the usual BBD chips is often a power of 2 (512, 1024 etc.), so the inverse clock frequency and the desired delay time will also have some 2**n ratio. All you have to do is to "multiply" the frequency of your midi clock or DIN sync or similar with a short variable factor (for the "12" in the clock, and for the user defined variable factor), and then with 2*N. So a PLL with a large binary counter in the loop should do it. (plus the little "12 and variable" stuff, as in the Blacet applications) The drawback is the very long settling time for the PLL, so (as someone pointed out on this list before) you'd have to run the clock all the time, and not just start it when your song starts. This is *all* theory - I have *not* tried this (nor will I try it in the near future.) JH.
Message
Re: [motm] Clock source schematics???
2002-01-12 by jhaible
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.