MOTM

I'd Probably buy one if we had 'em but I think I could live without it and 
not miss it too much.


>From: Mark Pulver <mpulver@...>
>Reply-To: motm@onelist.com
>To: motm@onelist.com
>Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-310 uVCO
>Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 10:28:37 -0500
>
>From: Mark Pulver <mpulver@...>
>
>james holloway (04:19 AM 9/3/99) wrote:
>
> >I like the ones we already have. Why make a low scale one?
>
>It's a great idea for someone building up a system and needs a couple of
>sub-oscillators. If you start building up a complex patch, then a simple
>VCO becomes great to have around for things like modulating filters, VCA's,
>etc.
>
>It doesn't have to be complex with PWM and all, just something to kick out
>some harmonics.
>
>Tuned low, and tracking at 1v/oct, this also makes for a great tracking
>LFO. And, if it only takes up one panel width... You can fit more in the
>same place.
>
>
>Personally, I never tire of having VCOs around... I'll stack 'em all over
>the place just to add character to a patch.
>
>Take a sawtooth and tune it about 3 or 4 octaves above your fundamental in
>a bass patch. Mix it in low, just so you can kinda feel it's presence more
>than hear it. If you like the resulting tonal character, then this is a
>need for a simple tracking VCO. Things like PWM don't need to be there -
>the effect of a PWM sweep dies anyway quickly at higher pitches.
>
>
>Mark
>
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>ONElist now has T-SHIRTS!
>For details and to order, go to:
><a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/tshirt1 ">Click Here</a>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>