MOTM

That was a very cool sound, but I'm not really sure what was delay 
and what was WaveWarper. There were a couple of parts where it 
sounded sort of like a freq. shifter. That was cool. I'm just not 
sure about some of the phasing and other sonic effects (if they were 
from the delay). 

 Andrew

--- In motm@y..., "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@j...> wrote:
> 
> I'll have to give it a better, louder listen at home tonight. It's 
a little
> too subtle for my PC speakers here at work. I can hear a few spots 
where it
> dips out... almost like pulse width being squeezed to near zero%, 
but
> otherwise I can't hear what's really happening [over these 
speakers] through
> all of the delay. I'm sure it's wonderful!
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@a...] 
> Sent: Friday, 31 August, 2001 10:01 AM
> To: MOTM listserv
> Subject: [motm] New module demo
> 
> At
> 
> www.synthtech.com/demo
> 
> you will see a 3.5MB file called wavewarpcity.mp3
> 
> This is a MiniWave, sequenced with a UEG (and some t.c. electronic 
M3000
> delay). As the sequence....errr...sequences
> we are turning knobs and adding CVs to a R&D module called the 
WaveWarper.
> This is the replacement for
> the Ring Mod section of the '110.
> 
> Except it can do MUCH more. It's still in R (not even into D) with 
wires
> hanging out all over the bench. But here
> is a test. The patch/wave out does not change. There is no 
filtering. The
> buzzes/overdrives/harmonics all
> from the WaveWarper.
> 
> No, it's not like Serge's, or Tony Allgoood's. Uses an entirely new
> log/anti-log concept borrowed from 1965 analog
> computers. MOTM-ized, of course :) Break out your trig books!
> 
> Paul S.