"Smoothly CV control over waveshape" is non-trival. It would add 40% to the cost, and the whole point of the '310 is a low cost VCO. Paul S. > I would cast a strong vote for CV control over variable waveshape > (saw>tri>pulse) over FM on that module.
Message
Re: [motm] uVCO Features (was: Quick update)
2001-06-05 by Paul Schreiber