Well, of course, one of each is absolutely required. Larry H (planning a bigger wood case). ---------- > From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> > To: motm@onelist.com > Subject: Re: [motm] Next filter - SSM 2040 clone > Date: Thursday, August 12, 1999 8:29 PM > > From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> > > And don't forget the SEM filter, the Xpander filter, ......:) > > Paul S. > > -----Original Message----- > From: JWBarlow@... <JWBarlow@...> > To: motm@onelist.com <motm@onelist.com> > Date: Thursday, August 12, 1999 8:20 PM > Subject: Re: [motm] Next filter - SSM 2040 clone > > > >From: JWBarlow@... > > > > > >In a message dated 8/12/99 4:56:15 PM, synth1@... writes: > > > >>Technically, it's *not* a "ladder structure*. It uses 4 discrete OTA > stages > >>in series. > > > >>I want to save the "ladder" word for when I go a true Moog-type LPF. > > > >DAMN! So many filters, so little cash! > > > >JB > > > >--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- > > > >ONElist: your connection to people who share your interests. > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ---------------------------- > > Having difficulty getting "in synch" with list members? > http://www.onelist.com > Try ONElist's Shared Calendar to organize events, meetings and more! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: Next filter - SSM 2040 clone
1999-08-13 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.