Yes! By ALL MEANS! Discuss all you want.
Don't get me wrong here, or read too much into my Napoleon-ish request. My
beef is discussing
other equipment *not in the MOTM context*, but as saying, "Look! A
cheaper/better solution!"
OK, so there are cheaper solutions. ZZZZzzzzzzz.........Yet to see a
*better* solution.
Again, if you OWN some comptitive equipment, and want to post a A/B
comparioson, PLEASE DO SO. I don't
even care if you think MOTM sucks. What is important is that the comparison
is 'real', as opposed to
"So and so has a VCO for $130 which you should consider."
Paul S.
King of the MOTM domain
Don't get me wrong here, or read too much into my Napoleon-ish request. My
beef is discussing
other equipment *not in the MOTM context*, but as saying, "Look! A
cheaper/better solution!"
OK, so there are cheaper solutions. ZZZZzzzzzzz.........Yet to see a
*better* solution.
Again, if you OWN some comptitive equipment, and want to post a A/B
comparioson, PLEASE DO SO. I don't
even care if you think MOTM sucks. What is important is that the comparison
is 'real', as opposed to
"So and so has a VCO for $130 which you should consider."
Paul S.
King of the MOTM domain
>competitive
> Just to clarify: There are many items that augement or enhance an MOTM
> system, such as the recent post about the Frostwave light controller. Or,
> for that matter, sequencers, even though they might be considered
> since there is planned an MOTM sequencer.be
>
> My opinion is that these help the usability of MOTM, and therefore should
> discussed on the list.
>