MOTM

I didn't mean that I was against an EG with more features than an ADSR. All
I meant was that if you add features to the point where an EG becomes a 4u
panel, there's a good chance that some of those features can be moved off to
another module. You know, make it more modular.

In this case, I was just suggesting that the "Delay" and "Hold" features
were more gate-related and could be made into a gate delay module. This
would free up panel space for other features more intrinsically necessary
for a VC/EG, such as the CV attenuators for the four stages. Having the gate
conditioning on a separate module also lets you use it to mess with other
kinds of pulses.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tentochi [mailto:tentochi@...]
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 3:25 PM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [motm] Re: Super VC DADSR EG


Someone said they don't want to complicate the EG. We already have an
uncomplicated EG though.