MOTM

I agree with you Ken.  A separate gate manipulation module is a great idea.

George

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Tkacs, Ken [SMTP:ken.tkacs@...]
> Sent:	Friday, March 30, 2001 12:09 PM
> To:	'motm@yahoogroups.com'
> Subject:	RE: [motm] Re: Super VC DADSR EG
> 
> 
	>>Personally, rather than put too many controls on an EG, I would
move those
> gate-conditioning functions off to a separate module where they can be
> used
> for other things, too. A Gate Delay/Hold module. I was thinking of
> tinkering
> something like that together, maybe based on the Roland System 100
> schematic. Or, heck, I think you can use a 555 timer and squeeze most of
> the
> gate conditioning functions you need out of it. It makes more sense to me
> to
> treat those as gating functions than to over-complicate the ADSR. But
> that's
> just one man's opinion, and I can understand why others would disagree.
	<<