Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] dBu

2001-03-26 by Paul Schreiber

>
> Thank you, I found similar information in the books I checked, but I was
> unsure how much depended on the impedances involved.  As you know, modern
> line level inputs are rarely 600 ohm, and I didn't want to use an equation
> taken out of context.

If it's not 600 ohms, the 0.77blah blah blah number changes. The new number
is left as an excercise for the reader.

>
> This is where I get confused.  Your earlier statement that, "the signal
> generators in MOTM use 10V pk-pk, or around +22dBu" seemed more in line
> with what some of the other people on the list are saying.
>
> For example, Larry seems to be using a Mackie, and Mackie claims a MIL of
> +22dBu, yet:
>
>
> So how is +13dBu anywhere near the edge of being too hot??  This doesn't
> make sense to me.  I'm trying to contradict anyone's observations, it's
> just that I think I must be missing something.


Well, +13 is lower than +22 :) Mixers have either an input pad trimmer or a
knob to adjust
this. So, shouldn't be an issue coming to going.


>
> Also, when I enter 20 * log (10/.7746) into my calculator I get 22.22.
> Working the other way, (.7746) * 10^(22/20) = 9.75.  Would someone please
> double check that for me??  If humanity relied on my half-assed math
skills
> we'd still be living in caves :)

That's because the .7746 is *RMS*. When you plug '10' into the equation,
that
means 10Vrms or 28V pk-pk. That is where the +22 comes from.

Again, just buy a mixer that has attenuators on the insert bus.

Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.