> > Thank you, I found similar information in the books I checked, but I was > unsure how much depended on the impedances involved. As you know, modern > line level inputs are rarely 600 ohm, and I didn't want to use an equation > taken out of context. If it's not 600 ohms, the 0.77blah blah blah number changes. The new number is left as an excercise for the reader. > > This is where I get confused. Your earlier statement that, "the signal > generators in MOTM use 10V pk-pk, or around +22dBu" seemed more in line > with what some of the other people on the list are saying. > > For example, Larry seems to be using a Mackie, and Mackie claims a MIL of > +22dBu, yet: > > > So how is +13dBu anywhere near the edge of being too hot?? This doesn't > make sense to me. I'm trying to contradict anyone's observations, it's > just that I think I must be missing something. Well, +13 is lower than +22 :) Mixers have either an input pad trimmer or a knob to adjust this. So, shouldn't be an issue coming to going. > > Also, when I enter 20 * log (10/.7746) into my calculator I get 22.22. > Working the other way, (.7746) * 10^(22/20) = 9.75. Would someone please > double check that for me?? If humanity relied on my half-assed math skills > we'd still be living in caves :) That's because the .7746 is *RMS*. When you plug '10' into the equation, that means 10Vrms or 28V pk-pk. That is where the +22 comes from. Again, just buy a mixer that has attenuators on the insert bus. Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] dBu
2001-03-26 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.