MOTM

well unfortunetly for some who use are MOTM in the studio, having to explain to
a producer or guitarist patching things this everytime is a pain. Id prefer the
switch as well. Also Dave Hylanders note about a LED would be cool.
Jim

J. Larry Hendry wrote:

> I have to disagree with the prevailing opinion here.  The jack switching is
> more efficient in that you do not need an external switch and you leave the
> panel space open for other things.  What is it that the external switch gets
> you?  Nothing I can see.
>
> with only one output connected, it is a 6 to 1 mixer.  With both jacked, it
> is a 3 to 1 mixer times 2.  What could be any more simple than that.  I have
> a DIY mixer built like that except  it is either 4 to 1 or 2 to 1 times 2
> with dedicated bias and LEDs on each 1/2.  when you plug in the second
> output, it splits the mixer, that simple.  I also added 2 LEDs that indicate
> whether the mixer is in 4 to 1 or 2 to 1 x 2 mode.  However, I have found
> that the LEDs are just not needed.
>
> So, I think Paul's concept of a switching jack is still best, but I think
> the "switch jack" should be the second output not the first.   Think about
> it -- one output plug and it is 6 to 1 --  two output plugs and it
> automatically splits off  3 of the inputs to the second output.  Highly
> intuitive.
> Larry H
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dave Hylander <david@...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 1:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
>
> I like the dedicated mode switch on mixer2.
>
> dave
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/