Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: MOTM-320 verification

2001-02-17 by GeorgeK

Whoops...yea, I meant +=15VDC.  Thanks for the info.  At some point I 
will pull R78 and measure it.

GK

--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> >
> > Note: I tuned the 900 so that the +- supplies are at +5.00VDC and 
-
> > 5.00VDC.
> 
> 
> I am hoping you mean +15 and -15V!!
> 
> >
> > Ok, so I'm a perfectionist, but I'm a bit concerned about the saw
> > output when the shape control is set to 10, as the waveform is 
not a
> > clean ramp.  Another point: the actual center of the waveform 
shape
> > adjustment is actually just a bit right of 5.  Since there are no
> > tunables in the PC board, I'm not sure what to look for, possibly 
a
> > resistor out of spec?
> 
> It's OK. You are just looking at resistor tolerances. The ramp 
"clean-ness"
> can
> be set by R78. This may need to go up or down some.
> 
> Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.