Milter-greylist

Here is 4.0.1, which is 4.0.1-rc1 with just an updated version number:
nobody reported any bug.

http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-4.0.1.tgz
MD5 (milter-greylist-4.0.1.tgz) = 80732ea6ac12fc304a9d83c09f316870

Changes since 4.0:
        Fix build of GeoIP code
        Fix auth and tls clauses in ACL so that they accept regex
        Update Debian startup script (Adam Katz)
        Fix bogus ACL when using features not compiled in
        Fix corruption in urlcheck parsing (Benoit Branciard)
        Document what package contains libmilter
        Fix error about stat in greylist.conf (Bob Smith)
        Avoid C99 specific syntax (Greg Troxel)
        Documentation fixes
        Fix typos in documentation (Constantine A. Murenin)

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...

At 11:25 PM 9.7.2008 +0200, you wrote: 

>>>>

  


>> Here is 4.0.1, which is 4.0.1-rc1 with just an updated version
number:

>> nobody reported any bug.

<<<<<<<<


Apparently I missed something or confused. Most recent version I have is
4.1.5.

Don't understand the lower v-4.0.1...???


Best,

Jack


>>>>

<excerpt>


</excerpt>



(^_^)

Happy trails,

Jack L. Stone


System Admin

Sage-american

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:00:12AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Apparently I missed something or confused. Most recent version I have 
> is 4.1.5. 
> Don't understand the lower v-4.0.1...??? 

4.0.1 is stable
4.1.5 is experimental

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@...

> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:00:12AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> > Apparently I missed something or confused. Most recent version I have 
> > is 4.1.5. 
> > Don't understand the lower v-4.0.1...???
> 
> 4.0.1 is stable
> 4.1.5 is experimental

Experimental, but I'm using it on my production servers and have been since
it's release.

Emmanuel's code is quite stable as far as I'm concerned.

Michael.

> -- 
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> manu@...
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>

Yes, I can confirm that too.
The experimental version is running to 2 of our production servers and I
had no problems so far....
Ondrej
Michael Mansour wrote:

>
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:00:12AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> > > Apparently I missed something or confused. Most recent version I have
> > > is 4.1.5.
> > > Don't understand the lower v-4.0.1...???
> >
> > 4.0.1 is stable
> > 4.1.5 is experimental
>
> Experimental, but I'm using it on my production servers and have been
> since
> it's release.
>
> Emmanuel's code is quite stable as far as I'm concerned.
>
> Michael.
>
> > --
> > Emmanuel Dreyfus
> > manu@... <mailto:manu%40netbsd.org>
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>

At 01:57 PM 9.9.2008 +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: 

>>>>

  


On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:00:12AM -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:

> Apparently I missed something or confused. Most recent version I have 

> is 4.1.5. 

> Don't understand the lower v-4.0.1...??? 


4.0.1 is stable

4.1.5 is experimental


-- 

Emmanuel Dreyfus


<<<<<<<<

Thanks! I've been using the "experimental" version for so long I didn't
know it was. Been very stable on my production servers.


Appreciate your & other's fine efforts!


Jack

>>>>

<excerpt>


</excerpt>



(^_^)

Happy trails,

Jack L. Stone


System Admin

Sage-american