Milter-greylist

Do I need to rebuild milter-greylist after applying the recent security 
fix to sendmail?

Kai

-- 
Kai Sch\ufffdtzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 15:31 schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Do I need to rebuild milter-greylist after applying the recent security
> fix to sendmail?

No. At least I didn't and it's still up and running... ;-)

>
> Kai

Leloup wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:46:11 +0100:

> No. At least I didn't and it's still up and running... ;-)

Yeah, it's up and running, but it could use unsecure library routines if 
it compiled them in ... However, I guess the sendmail libs are dynamically 
linked in, so this can't be the case?

Kai

-- 
Kai Sch\ufffdtzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 16:31 schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Leloup wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:46:11 +0100:
> > No. At least I didn't and it's still up and running... ;-)
>
> Yeah, it's up and running, but it could use unsecure library routines if
> it compiled them in ... However, I guess the sendmail libs are dynamically
> linked in, so this can't be the case?

*doh*... I guess too, but I really do not know... :-)
But as far as I understood the sendmail announce, the security fix wasn't in 
libmilter...?

>
> Kai

Leloup wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:54:16 +0100:

> But as far as I understood the sendmail announce, the security fix wasn't in 
> libmilter...?

No, it wasn't, it was in smtp.c I think. But, well, I thought I better ask. I 
know a little C/C++, but not too much and only developing on the Windows 
platform, so it's hard for me to tell if a rebuild is better to be done or not.

Kai

-- 
Kai Sch\ufffdtzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com