Yahoo Groups archive

Milter-greylist

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:32 UTC

Thread

Feedback on 2.0rc5

Feedback on 2.0rc5

2005-06-18 by manu@netbsd.org

Hi everybody

There have been no feedback on 2.0rc5. I'll assume that this means there
is nothing to complain about and I plan to release milter-greylist 2.0
next week. Except if someone find a new bug, of course.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Le cahier de l'admin BSD 2eme ed. est dans toutes les bonnes librairies
http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php
manu@...

Re: [milter-greylist] Feedback on 2.0rc5

2005-06-18 by Dan Hollis

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 manu@... wrote:
> There have been no feedback on 2.0rc5. I'll assume that this means there
> is nothing to complain about and I plan to release milter-greylist 2.0
> next week. Except if someone find a new bug, of course.

I'm currently trying to trace down a bug in 2.0rc5 where milter-greylist 
daemon mysteriously exits on x86_64.

-Dan

Re: [milter-greylist] Feedback on 2.0rc5

2005-06-18 by manu@netbsd.org

Dan Hollis <goemon@...> wrote:

> I'm currently trying to trace down a bug in 2.0rc5 where milter-greylist
> daemon mysteriously exits on x86_64.

Right, let's hold on for you to fix it.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...

Re: [milter-greylist] Feedback on 2.0rc5

2005-06-20 by Dan Hollis

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 manu@... wrote:
> Dan Hollis <goemon@...> wrote:
> > I'm currently trying to trace down a bug in 2.0rc5 where milter-greylist
> > daemon mysteriously exits on x86_64.
> Right, let's hold on for you to fix it.

Ok, it seems that sendmail dies with SIGBUS and milter-greylist gets 
SIGKILL and exits. I'm not sure why this happens.

-Dan

Re: [milter-greylist] Feedback on 2.0rc5

2005-06-20 by manu@netbsd.org

Dan Hollis <goemon@...> wrote:

> Ok, it seems that sendmail dies with SIGBUS and milter-greylist gets 
> SIGKILL and exits. I'm not sure why this happens.

SIGBUS means something is rotten in sendmail's kindom. Maybe sendmail
catch SIGBUS and kills its milter? That would be odd, but it's worth
checking it. What happens if you send SIGBUS by hand to sendmail?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php
manu@...

Re: [milter-greylist] Feedback on 2.0rc5

2005-06-20 by Dan Hollis

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 manu@... wrote:
> Dan Hollis <goemon@...> wrote:
> > Ok, it seems that sendmail dies with SIGBUS and milter-greylist gets 
> > SIGKILL and exits. I'm not sure why this happens.
> SIGBUS means something is rotten in sendmail's kindom. Maybe sendmail
> catch SIGBUS and kills its milter? That would be odd, but it's worth
> checking it. What happens if you send SIGBUS by hand to sendmail?

greylist doesn't die if I send SIGBUS by hand. I don't see how sendmail 
could possibly kill the milter though, as they just communicate through a 
socket, it's not a child process.

It's really very strange.

-Dan

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.