On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 09:05:57AM +0100, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > > 1.) Host "mail.a.com" hast an alias "foobar@..." which contains "1@..." > > and "2@...". > > > > 2.) Host "mail.a.com" send an e-mail to "non@..." which bounces > > with "foobar@..." as the sender. > > > > 3.) Host "mail.a.com" delivers the bounce to "foobar@...", expands it > > to "1@..." and "2@..." and tries to deliver that to "mail.b.com". > So, would it be a problem to greylist the DSN if 1@... asked for > greylisting and not 2@...? No. In step 3 the mailer on "mail.a.com" will deliver an e-mail with a null sender address to two people on "mail.b.com" which IIUC is what the discussion was about. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-11 by Matthias Scheler