Moritz Both <mb@...> wrote: > So nobody said delaying until after the DATA phase if the sender is null > is a bad thing. Happy to be able to contribute easily, here is the patch > against 1.6 (I havn't tried the development versions because production > is my goal and of course this patch is bug free). Well, developping against non latest code is not a good idea. I'll try if it applies on 1.7.x. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-04 by manu@netbsd.org