Ivan F. Martinez <ml@...> wrote: > My idea is to use Berkeley on the big whitelist, not for dynamic part. > I'm testing a patch to access the db from sendmail and passing data to > milter. Oh, ok, that seems acceptable. > The patch is available : > http://www.saisp.br/ifm/patches/milter-greylist.c.patch > > Also a m4 file to configure milter-greylist, and a sample Rule to get > data from access.db > http://www.saisp.br/ifm/patches/milter-greylist.m4 > > I'm accepting suggestions to make it better. FWIW, Ivan sent me the patch behind the scene, and I'd like some feedback from other contributors. Especially from Remy Card for ACL interraction. I wonder if there woulnd't be some benefit to expcitely pull various whitelist/greylist methods from the ACL. Something like this: acl whitelist sendmaildb acl greylist default That would enable mixing greylist.conf ACL with sendmail DB. The same trick could be used for SPF. I wonder if it would make sense to do the same for SMTP auth or authowhitelist, as those would always tend to be thefirst items in the ACL. Opinions? Don't hesitate to tell me that it's useless and too complicated :-) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.