At 02:51 PM 11.23.2004 +0000, you wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:43:08AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: >> I agree that it would not be good to "bloat" the code on milter-greylist, >> but I sure would like to use the "callback" feature. I cannot do that by >> using milter-sender because it requires a later version of DB than the one >> already compiled in sendmail-8.12.11 -- which is already compiled in my >> base system of FBSD-4.10. > >You can't install two versions of DB at the same time? > Sure, and I have tried that. However, the milter-sender instructs says: [...}Note that Sendmail will probably have to be rebuilt to use Berkeley DB, especially if the library was never installed and/or Sendmail was built against an older version of Berkeley DB.[...] So, if not compiled in, sendmail/milters won't use the new DB just merely installed. >But if you need the callback function and could not use milter-sender, >then what about writing another milter? > ....alas, I don't write code -- not that I wouldn't want to, but it is just not one of my skills. Also, I suppose "bloat" can stem from too many milters running -- sort of winds up at the same place as one bigger milter...?? >> It would be nice to be able to make use of existing DBs like the >> "/etc/mailaccess" and aliases,etc. > >Here I agree. It would be nice to get milter-greylist capable of getting >its whitelist from other sources than than the config file. > ....yes, this is what I have rooted for if that were possible. >Such a change should probably await for Remy Card's work on ACL, though. >Remy, what's your opinion here? > Hope Remy is encouraged in this direction. >-- >Emmanuel Dreyfus >manu@... > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: quiet option
2004-11-24 by Jack L. Stone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.