Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 � 12:40 +0100, John Damm S�rensen
john@... [milter-greylist] a �crit :
>
> So both greylist and mimedefang fails. Do you see anything in the
> logs? Are they failing on the same email maessage?
Both have always the same sendmail PID 17925 in the example
> How are they defined in the .cf/.mc file?
Well ... I hope
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist', `S=local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock, T=C=6m;S:10m;R:10m;E:10m')dnl
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang', `S=unix:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock, F=T, T=S:360s;R:360s;E:15m')
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`opendkim', `S=inet:4445@127.0.0.1')dnl
I can try to use an inet socket, but I have other milter with local
socket and they do not log NOQUEUE messages.
Milter API evolved with time. Could we have both in mimedefang and
milter-greylist and old style milter callback indirectly related with
theses log lines ??
Another cause (the stange period of 5mn) could be a nagios monitoring
occuring regularly but in that case why only 2 milters are affected ?
I found inside sendmail source and KNOWBUGS file a bug related to
NOQUEUE: but not related with milter
=====
* accept() problem on Linux.
The accept() in sendmail daemon loop can return ETIMEDOUT. An
error is reported to syslog:
Jun 9 17:14:12 hostname sendmail[207]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root):
getrequests: accept: Connection timed out
"Connection timed out" is not documented as a valid return from
accept(2) and this was believed to be a bug in the Linux kernel.
Later information from the Linux kernel group states that Linux
2.0 kernels follow RFC1122 while sendmail follows the original BSD
(now POSIX 1003.1g draft) specification. The 2.1.X and later kernels
will follow the POSIX draft.
=====
I have a 2.6.X kernel so both kernel and sendmail are POSIX ... and I
have no such message
>
> /john
>
>
>
> Den 16-03-2018 kl. 12:32 skrev Christian P�lissier
> Christian.Pelissier@... [milter-greylist]:
>
> >
> > Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 � 09:46 +0100, John Damm S�rensen
> > john@... [milter-greylist] a �crit :
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.sendmail.milter.greylist/2827
> >
> > I have no 10s timeout. I've changed C:5m to c:6m. Logging period is
> > always 5mn.
> >
> > Mimedefang log the same thing at the same time but opendkim,
> > opendmarc
> > clamav do not log NOQUEUE message.
> >
> > Mar 16 12:27:10 mx sendmail[17925]: NOQUEUE: Milter (greylist): to
> > error state
> > Mar 16 12:27:10 mx sendmail[17925]: NOQUEUE: Milter (mimedefang): to
> > error state
> >
> > Opendkim and Opendmarc have default flags
> >
> > --
> > Christian P�lissier
> > \ue40aONERA DSI/ISR BP72 92322 Chatillon CEDEX\ue409
> > \ue201 34419
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Virusfri. www.avast.com
>
>
>
--
Christian P�lissier
\ue40aONERA DSI/ISR BP72 92322 Chatillon CEDEX\ue409
\ue201 34419Message
Re: [milter-greylist] NOQUEUE: Milter (greylist): to error state
2018-03-16 by Christian Pélissier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.