Richard, I’m curious now. When you say bogus, is it that the sending ip was forged or the person reporting didn’t investigate closely enough? (I can provide headers for a recent UGG spam if you want an example.) Bill > On Nov 28, 2017, at 7:50 PM, Richard Johnsson johnsson@hamilton.com [milter-greylist] <milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > > My mail server is at Linode. I get a spam complaint ticket from Linode every 2-3 months. All are bogus, and it takes a lot of time to respond to them. > > > On 11/28/2017 12:16 PM, Bill Levering idbill@... [milter-greylist] wrote: >> >> Anyone notice that Linode’ s address space appears to have recently grown significantly? >> >> I only get UGG Outlet and Sunglasses spam from their address space, which is why I notice. >> >> Also… what is the consensus of reporting spam back to the originating ISP? >> >> I used to do this faithfully, by attaching the original message in a new email back to the abuse/spam address listed on the ISP website. >> That way the ISP will have ALL the info needed to prove that it was spam and where it originated. >> >> But Microsnot/Outlook in their infinite wisdom doesn’t allow attachments. >> So I used to forward the emails to them with a new subject line. Well… they then decided I was a spammer and started blocking all mail from my server! >> I had to call them to get the block lifted, but I’m now on probation... >> >> Most of the time I don’t get any response, so I wonder if reporting is a wasted effort. >> >> Bill >> > > > >
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Linode and reporting spam back to ISPs
2017-11-29 by Bill Levering
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.