On July 11, 2017 5:37:30 AM GMT+02:00, "manu@... [milter-greylist]" <milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >Frank Doepper fd@... [milter-greylist] ><milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > >> three years ago I suggested a patch: >> >> > I redo it with -U16 and put it there: >> > http://taz.de/~fd/stuff/tarpit.patch > >Sorry for ignoring it for so long. > >It changes the behavior, should there be an option for this? Anyone has >an opinion on the topic? I'd say yes, and defaulting to off - for the sake of least-surprise principle when upgrading. Otherwise, the idea is good. Might make even more sense in rulesets I published on github that track "spamminess score" in a variable, to suggest that an insistent host might be a good one (so not instant AWL for all that pass it, but more likely to get WLed). Jim -- Typos courtesy of K-9 Mail on my Redmi Android
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: tarpit auto-whitelisting
2017-07-11 by Jim Klimov
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.