On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Jim Klimov jimklimov@... [milter-greylist] wrote: > > We use p0f (3.06b, 3.08b iirc is last) coerced to compile under > solarish oses that we use (tweaks should be on my github). Depending > on platform release we had libpcap issues that it processed packets > by larger buffers at once, so p0f might not yet have answers when > needed. Does using the p0f feature increase the opportunity for a security weakness so it is more likely that the host machine can be compromised? Can it work in VMs, containers, or Solaris zones, which are not allowed access to raw packets due to network security concerns? Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@..., http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] problem building with p0f support, p0f or better using dialin RBL?
2016-09-13 by Bob Friesenhahn