Hi,
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:30:54 +0900
>>>>> "Kazuyuki YOSHIDA yoshida@... [milter-greylist]" <milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com> said:
yosh> # two patches at 3:48(+9) & 4:08(+9) look same.
No, there was a difference in an index of the addr array. :)
yosh> There is a extra '(' in patch for dnsrbl.h.
yosh> +char *iptorevstr((struct sockaddr *, socklen_t, char *, size_t);
Oops, thanks.
I reworked for further simplify. Now, istorevstr() does thing which
reverse_endian() did, as well.Message
Re: [milter-greylist] dnsrbl for IPv6
2015-12-24 by Hajimu UMEMOTO