Hi, Today we have seven mx relays and each machine has the other six as peers. I often see 10-20 of these each second in my logs: " peer IP_for_apeer queue overflow (1024 entries), discarding new entry in " Should we be syncing like this? Would it make more sense to limit peers to one or two hosts each and push updates in that way such: Let each mx relay be labeled a, b, c, d, e, f, and g. Each relay would sync with the mx relays on the right hand side: a -> b, c b -> c, d c -> d, e d -> e, f e -> f, g f -> g, a g -> a, b Instead of how we do it today: a -> b, c, d, e, f, g b -> c, d, e, f, g, a etc Thanks! Jonathan
Message
[milter-greylist] Question about merit of syncing across 7 mx relays all at the same time
2015-11-06 by Jonathan Siegle