Milter-greylist

On 2014-02-09 18:24, Jim Klimov wrote:
> FYI: for milter-greylist users who (want to) use p0f fingerprinting

I also found that if p0fsock is enabled, the filter is called - even
if there are no p0f ACLs requiring that. Moreover, this filter is
called at the beginning of connection-processing by milter-greylist
instead of the position where it is referenced by config file.

Can anything be done about this (to ensure orderly processing of
rules)?

Thanks,
//Jim Klimov