On 2013-10-13 at 12:59, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Namely, I wonder if I can utilize the "dnsrbl" rules within the
> milter-greylist in such a way that static whitelisted ip-addresses,
> domains, RCPTs and FROMs are honoured and always accepted, but the
> auto-whited hosts might still be rejected due to their newly found
> presence in DNS RBLs.
I've been looking at flushaddr to solve this problem. The notation would
look like:
acl blacklist dnsrbl "PSU BLACKLIST" msg "You are on the PSU blacklist.
Please go away" flushaddr
Here is some info from the man page found in the 4.4.3 source:
flushaddr
If a message matches the rule, any entry in the
greylist or autowhite databases matching the sender IP
is removed. Used with a DNSRBL blacklist ACL, it is
useful for freeing the database from entries set up by
a machine which is known to be a spammer. Example:
racl blacklist dnsrbl "known-spammer" flushaddr
>
> Is this as simple as defining racl's in the order of "whitelist,
> dnsrbl, greylist", or are there some more complicated considerations?
>
I am testing:
whitelist
dnsrbl black
greylist
default whitelist
-JonathanMessage
Re: [milter-greylist] Question about whitelist, greylist and dnsrbl
2013-10-15 by Jonathan Siegle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.